预成型肋骨锁定钛板内固定与胸部护板外固定对创伤性多发肋骨骨折的应用效果对比

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2024.01.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨预成型肋骨锁定钛板内固定与胸部护板外固定对创伤性多发肋骨骨折的应用效果对比。方法选取2020年7月—2023年1月收治的创伤性多发肋骨骨折患者76例,分为对照组和观察组,各组均为38例。对照组采取胸部护板外固定治疗,观察组采取预成型肋骨锁定钛板内固定治疗。对比两组患者临床疗效;对比两组患者首次下床时间、术后7 d 疼痛视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分、机械通气时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间;分别在术后7 d及术后3个月应用肺功能检测仪检测两组患者第1秒用力呼气容积（FEV₁）、用力肺活量（FVC）及第1秒用力呼气量占用力肺活量比值（FEV₁/FVC）等相关肺功能指标变化,对比两组间差异;最后对比两组术后并发症发生率。结果观察组优良率明显高于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组患者首次下床时间、术后7 d VAS评分、机械通气时间、住院时间以及骨折愈合时间明显低于对照组（P<0.05）;术后7 d两组患者FEV₁、FVC和FEV₁/FVC对比无明显差异（P>0.05）,术后3个月两组患者FEV₁、FVC和FEV₁/FVC均升高,且观察组高于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论对创伤性多发肋骨骨折患者采取预成型肋骨锁定钛板内固定治疗的效果优于胸部护板外固定治疗,且能够促进患者康复,提升远期肺功能,降低术后并发症发生率。

关键词: 预成型肋骨锁定钛板, 胸部护板, 内固定, 外固定, 创伤性多发肋骨骨折, 肺功能, 并发症

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of preformed rib locking titanium plate internal fixation and chest guard plate external fixation on traumatic multiple rib fractures. Methods A total of 76 patients with traumatic multiple rib fractures from July 2020 to January 2023 were selected as study subjects and divided into two groups, 38 cases in each group. The control group was treated with external fixation with chest guard plate, and the observation group was treated with internal fixation with preformed rib locking titanium plate. The clinical efficacy, the first out-of-bed time, visual analogue scale （VAS） score at 7 d postoperatively, mechanical ventilation time, hospitalization time, and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups. The forced expiratory volume in the first second （FEV₁）, forced vital capacity （FVC）, and ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity （FEV₁/FVC） were detected with a pulmonary function measuring device at 7 d and 3 months after operation, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was also compared. Results Compared to the control group, the excellent and good rate of the observation group was significantly higher （P<0.05）; the first out-of-bed time, VAS score at 7 d postoperatively, mechanical ventilation time, hospitalization time, and fracture healing time in the observation group were significantly shorter （P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/FVC between the two groups 7 d after operation （P>0.05）. FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/FVC in the two groups increased 3 months after operation, and the observation group showed higher levels than the control group （P<0.05）. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group （P<0.05）. Conclusion For patients with traumatic multiple rib fractures, the effect of internal fixation with preformed rib locking titanium plate is better than that of external fixation with chest guard plate, which can promote the early recovery of patients, improve long-term lung function, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words: Preformed rib locking titanium plate, Chest guard, Internal fixation, External fixation, Traumatic multiple rib fracture, Pulmonary function, Complication

中图分类号:

R687.3

陈正钢, 汤卫兵, 陆文强, 茅怡铭. 预成型肋骨锁定钛板内固定与胸部护板外固定对创伤性多发肋骨骨折的应用效果对比[J]. 外科研究与新技术（中英文）, 2024, 13(1): 18-22.

CHEN Zhenggang, TANG Weibing, LU Wenqiang, MAO Yiming. Comparison of effects of preformed rib locking titanium plate internal fixation and chest guard plate external fixation on traumatic multiple rib fractures[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2024, 13(1): 18-22.

参考文献

[1] Peek J, Beks RB, Hietbrink F, et al.Complications and outcome after rib fracture fixation: a systematic review[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020, 89(2): 411-418.
[2] 王伯珉,杨永良,贾宏磊,等.多发肋骨骨折的治疗进展[J].创伤外科杂志,2021,23(12):948-951.
[3] Wijffels MME, Prins JTH, Perpetua Alvino EJ, et al.Operative versus nonoperative treatment of multiple simple rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Injury, 2020, 51(11): 2368-2378.
[4] 桑宏阳,邬松,范正洋,等.预成型肋骨锁定钛板联合超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞治疗老年多发性肋骨骨折[J].中国骨伤, 2022, 35(10): 979-983.
[5] McRae R, Esser M. 实用骨折治疗指南[M]. 张英泽,潘进社,译.天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2011:10-12.
[6] 吕晨,邹建玲,沈淑华,等. 视觉模拟量表和语言评价量表用于术后疼痛评估的比较[J].全科医学临床与教育,2004,2(4):214-219.
[7] Gilbertson J, Pageau P, Ritcey B, et al.Test characteristics of chest ultrasonography for rib fractures following blunt chest trauma: asystematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2022, 79(6): 529-539.
[8] Hoepelman RJ, Beeres FJP, Heng M, et al.Rib fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2023, 143(2): 887-893.
[9] Skou ST, Juhl CB, Hare KB, et al.Surgical or non-surgical treatment of traumatic skeletal fractures in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms[J]. Syst Rev, 2020, 9(1): 179.
[10] 曹亮,王树军,张道忠.3种治疗方法在多发性肋骨骨折中的应用效果比较[J].安徽医学,2021,42(8):925-928.
[11] 王晓奇,许咏冬,王冬冬,等.纯钛六爪抓握式肋骨接骨板内固定对多发性肋骨骨折患者血气分析,肺通气功能及运动耐力的影响[J].临床误诊误治,2022,35(11):79-83.
[12] Choi J, Gomez GI, Kaghazchi A, et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture to mitigate pulmonary complication and mortality: asystematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2021, 232(2): 211-219. e2.
[13] Craxford S, Owyang D, Marson B, et al.Surgical management of rib fractures after blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2022, 104(4): 249-256.
[14] 冉隆强,李勇,贾萌.胸腔镜辅助内固定术对多发肋骨骨折合并胸部创伤患者肺功能及预后的影响[J].中国医刊,2023, 58(5):517-520.
[15] Peek J, Beks RB, Kremo V, et al.The evaluation of pulmonary function after rib fixation for multiple rib fractures and flail chest: a retrospective study and systematic review of the current evidence[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2021, 47(4): 1105-1114.
[16] 张印. 电视胸腔镜精准定位复位内固定术对胸部外伤合并肋骨骨折患者的疗效及肺功能的影响[J].检验医学与临床, 2022,19(7):921-924.